<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://mw.hh.se/caisr/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Review</id>
	<title>Review - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://mw.hh.se/caisr/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Review"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mw.hh.se/caisr/index.php?title=Review&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-04T19:49:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mw.hh.se/caisr/index.php?title=Review&amp;diff=156&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>10.0.2.2: Created page with &quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;PhD winter conference - Review Process&#039;&#039;&#039;  Step-by-step procedure:  # Every student attending the conference submits paper # Each PhD student taking the &#039;Scientific Communi...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mw.hh.se/caisr/index.php?title=Review&amp;diff=156&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-03-07T11:46:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;PhD winter conference - Review Process&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  Step-by-step procedure:  # Every student attending the conference submits paper # Each PhD student taking the &amp;#039;Scientific Communi...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;PhD winter conference - Review Process&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step-by-step procedure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Every student attending the conference submits paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Each PhD student taking the &amp;#039;Scientific Communication&amp;#039; course shall read three papers and write reviews.&lt;br /&gt;
# Each PhD student NOT taking the course shall read a single paper and discuss it with a PhD student taking the course together with a senior.&lt;br /&gt;
#*If the PhD student NOT taking the course also writes a review and hand in to the senior this could give credits to the course (if he or she is taking the course later) or if he/she discuss it with supervisor.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Discussion of the papers/reviews:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Attendances: 1 student taking SC course (3 papers+3 reviews) + 3 students not taking course (each one paper) + seniour (3 papers+3 reviews)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pseudo-code for the review-process:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;#039;Student taking SC course&amp;#039; (S) reads paper A, B and C and writes review RA, RB and RC.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The senior reads A, B, C, RA, RB and RC.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Three other students denoted X, Y and Z not taking the course reads either A, B or C (only one paper).&lt;br /&gt;
:*S, the senior, X, Y and Z meet up and discuss the reviews and the papers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the process the group should fill in the report:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www2.hh.se/staff/vero/cc/form1.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>10.0.2.2</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>