Publications:Improving Very Low-Resolution Iris Identification Via Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Local Patches

From ISLAB/CAISR
Revision as of 22:22, 17 August 2017 by Slawek (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style='display: none'> == Do not edit this section == </div> {{PublicationSetupTemplate|Author=Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Reuben A. Farrugia, Josef Bigun |PID=1133802 |Na...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Do not edit this section

Property "Author" has a restricted application area and cannot be used as annotation property by a user. Property "Author" has a restricted application area and cannot be used as annotation property by a user. Property "Author" has a restricted application area and cannot be used as annotation property by a user.

Keep all hand-made modifications below

Title Improving Very Low-Resolution Iris Identification Via Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Local Patches
Author
Year 2017
PublicationType Conference Paper
Journal
HostPublication
Conference 16th International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG), Darmstadt, Germany, September 20-22, 2017
DOI
Diva url http://hh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?searchId=1&pid=diva2:1133802
Abstract

Relaxed acquisition conditions in iris recognition systems have significant effects on the quality and resolution of acquired images, which can severely affect performance if not addressed properly. Here, we evaluate two trained super-resolution algorithms in the context of iris identification. They are based on reconstruction of local image patches, where each patch is reconstructed separately using its own optimal reconstruction function. We employ a database of 1,872 near-infrared iris images (with 163 different identities for identification experiments) and three iris comparators. The trained approaches are substantially superior to bilinear or bicubic interpolations, with one of the comparators providing a Rank-1 performance of ∼88% with images of only 15×15 pixels, and an identification rate of 95% with a hit list size of only 8 identities.