<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM16Newton</id>
	<title>WG211/M16Newton - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM16Newton"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M16Newton&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T20:58:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M16Newton&amp;diff=1530&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Eric: Created page with &quot;Ryan Newton:  Why is auto-tuning not composable?  Have you ever used auto-tuned software without knowing you were doing so?  From a software engineering perspective, where mod...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M16Newton&amp;diff=1530&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-08-22T17:44:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Ryan Newton:  Why is auto-tuning not composable?  Have you ever used auto-tuned software without knowing you were doing so?  From a software engineering perspective, where mod...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Ryan Newton:  Why is auto-tuning not composable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you ever used auto-tuned software without knowing you were doing so?  From a software engineering perspective, where modularity and encapsulation are paramount, auto-tuning currently has serious drawbacks.  In the future, what will it take to import two modules into a program, each of which uses auto-tuning features internally, without the programmer becoming intimately familiar with the implementation details?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Eric</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>