<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM17Oliveira</id>
	<title>WG211/M17Oliveira - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM17Oliveira"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M17Oliveira&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T23:02:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M17Oliveira&amp;diff=1679&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ups: Created page with &quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Semantic Modularization Techniques in Practice: A TAPL case study&#039;&#039;&#039; by Bruno Oliveira  In this talk I will present a case study on a modular implementation of the Types an...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M17Oliveira&amp;diff=1679&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-07-15T10:28:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Semantic Modularization Techniques in Practice: A TAPL case study&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Bruno Oliveira  In this talk I will present a case study on a modular implementation of the Types an...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Semantic Modularization Techniques in Practice: A TAPL case study&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Bruno Oliveira&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this talk I will present a case study on a modular implementation&lt;br /&gt;
of the Types and Programming Languages (TAPL) interpreters. In our&lt;br /&gt;
modular implementation, extensions of interpreters can reuse code from&lt;br /&gt;
existing interpreters without resorting to copy&amp;amp;paste techniques. One&lt;br /&gt;
interesting aspect in this work is that the modularization techniques&lt;br /&gt;
are semantic. That is the various language components are directly&lt;br /&gt;
implemented in a statically typed programming language (such as Java&lt;br /&gt;
or Scala). Those components can be statically type-checked, separately&lt;br /&gt;
compiled and later (type-)safely composed with other language&lt;br /&gt;
components to build complete languages or larger language components.&lt;br /&gt;
Our approach employs frameworks based on variants of Object Algebras&lt;br /&gt;
combined with some simple program generation techniques aimed at&lt;br /&gt;
removing boilerplate code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using TAPL as a case study is interesting for several reasons. Firstly&lt;br /&gt;
TAPL contains several programming language features that are relevant&lt;br /&gt;
in practice. Secondly TAPL accounts for different aspects of language&lt;br /&gt;
implementation (dynamic semantics, static semantics and parsing).&lt;br /&gt;
Finally there are many difficulties in modularizing TAPL interpreters,&lt;br /&gt;
including the use of a small-step semantics, operations that require&lt;br /&gt;
non-structural forms of pattern matching, and dependencies between&lt;br /&gt;
operations.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ups</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>