<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM19Mainland</id>
	<title>WG211/M19Mainland - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=WG211%2FM19Mainland"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M19Mainland&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T21:08:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.5</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M19Mainland&amp;diff=2003&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ups: Created page with &quot;&#039;&#039;Compiling Low-level Radio Protocols&#039;&#039; by Geoffrey Mainland  Implementing a physical-layer (PHY) radio protocol, like 802.11, requires expert knowledge of both digital signal...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mw.hh.se/wg211/index.php?title=WG211/M19Mainland&amp;diff=2003&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-04-23T20:04:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Compiling Low-level Radio Protocols&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Geoffrey Mainland  Implementing a physical-layer (PHY) radio protocol, like 802.11, requires expert knowledge of both digital signal...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Compiling Low-level Radio Protocols&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Geoffrey Mainland&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implementing a physical-layer (PHY) radio protocol, like 802.11,&lt;br /&gt;
requires expert knowledge of both digital signal processing techniques&lt;br /&gt;
and---since performance is critically important---the low-level details&lt;br /&gt;
of the platform on which the PHY layer will run. However, even for an&lt;br /&gt;
expert, development is painful---there are no good constructs for&lt;br /&gt;
writing *compositional* code in this domain while simultaneously meeting&lt;br /&gt;
performance requirements, and code that does meet performance&lt;br /&gt;
requirements is invariable tied to a specific platform. I will discuss&lt;br /&gt;
new language abstractions that, along with compiler optimizations, allow&lt;br /&gt;
an expert programmer to write compositional code without sacrificing&lt;br /&gt;
(too much) performance. I will also make the case that these language&lt;br /&gt;
constructs can be mapped to efficient code on several different kinds of&lt;br /&gt;
platforms, including CPUs, DSPs, and FPGAs. Furthermore, many of these&lt;br /&gt;
abstractions are not tied to PHY protocols, but could be applied to many&lt;br /&gt;
sorts of streaming computations.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ups</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>