On Friday October 17, this site was moved to a new server, https://mw.hh.se. The original address will continue to work. Whithin a week or two this site will return to the original address. /Peo HH IT-dep

WG211/M13Blazy: Difference between revisions

From WG 2.11
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Compilers are complicated pieces of software that sometimes contain bugs causing wrong executable code to be silently generated from correct source programs. In turn, this possib..."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Compilers are complicated pieces of software that sometimes contain bugs causing wrong executable code to be silently generated from correct source programs. In turn, this possibility of compiler-introduced bugs diminishes the assurance that can be obtained by applying formal methods to source code. This talk gives an overview of the CompCert project: an ongoing experiment in developing and formally proving correct a realistic, moderately-optimizing compiler from a large subset of C to popular assembly languages. The correctness proof, mechanized using the Coq proof assistant, establishes that the generated assembly code behaves exactly as prescribed by the semantic of the C source, eliminating all possibilities of compiler-introduced bugs and generating unprecedented confidence in this compiler.  
Compilers are complicated pieces of software that sometimes contain bugs causing wrong executable code to be silently generated from correct source programs. In turn, this possibility of compiler-introduced bugs diminishes the assurance that can be obtained by applying formal methods to source code. This talk gives an overview of the CompCert project: an ongoing experiment in developing and formally proving correct a realistic, moderately-optimizing compiler from a large subset of C to popular assembly languages. The correctness proof, mechanized using the Coq proof assistant, establishes that the generated assembly code behaves exactly as prescribed by the semantic of the C source, eliminating all possibilities of compiler-introduced bugs and generating unprecedented confidence in this compiler.  
In my talk, I will present an external view of the CompCert compiler and will detail some recent experiments about compiling an avionics software.
In my talk, I will present an external view of the CompCert compiler and will detail some recent experiments about compiling an avionics software.
For more about CompCert, please visit [http://compcert.inria.fr] .
For more about CompCert, please visit [http://compcert.inria.fr http://compcert.inria.fr] .

Latest revision as of 01:27, 17 February 2014

Compilers are complicated pieces of software that sometimes contain bugs causing wrong executable code to be silently generated from correct source programs. In turn, this possibility of compiler-introduced bugs diminishes the assurance that can be obtained by applying formal methods to source code. This talk gives an overview of the CompCert project: an ongoing experiment in developing and formally proving correct a realistic, moderately-optimizing compiler from a large subset of C to popular assembly languages. The correctness proof, mechanized using the Coq proof assistant, establishes that the generated assembly code behaves exactly as prescribed by the semantic of the C source, eliminating all possibilities of compiler-introduced bugs and generating unprecedented confidence in this compiler. In my talk, I will present an external view of the CompCert compiler and will detail some recent experiments about compiling an avionics software. For more about CompCert, please visit http://compcert.inria.fr .