Game-Theoretic Trust Evaluation for Objective Conflict Resolution
| Title | Game-Theoretic Trust Evaluation for Objective Conflict Resolution |
|---|---|
| Summary | Design and implement a trust evaluation mechanism that distinguishes between legitimate goal divergence and malicious behavior using game-theoretic principles. |
| Keywords | |
| TimeFrame | |
| References | 1. Fernandes, R., Hieb, M. R., & Costa, P. C. “Levels of Autonomy: Command and Control of Hybrid Forces”, 21st ICCRTS, 2016.
2. Dunin-Keplicz, B., & Verbrugge, R. “Teamwork in Multi-agent Systems: A formal approach”, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 3. Alberts, D. S. “The Agility Advantage: A Survival Guide for Complex Enterprises and Endeavors”, CCRP Publication Series, 2011. |
| Prerequisites | |
| Author | |
| Supervisor | EDISON PIGNATON DE FREITAS |
| Level | Master |
| Status | Open |
Goals
Design and implement a trust evaluation mechanism that distinguishes between legitimate goal divergence and malicious behavior using game-theoretic principles.
Trust Evaluation Mechanism
Designs a mechanism to distinguish legitimate goal divergence from malicious behavior using game theory.
Multi-Agent System Modeling
Models agent objectives and conflicts to analyze interactions and trust decisions through simulations.
Performance Evaluation Criteria
Evaluates precision, false trust decision reduction, and scalability across team sizes and missions.
Thesis Deliverables:
Includes algorithm, simulations, performance report, and comprehensive thesis document.
Main Tasks: - Task 1: Study game theory in multi-agent systems and trust dilemmas. - Task 2: Model agent objectives and potential conflicts. - Task 3: Develop game-theoretic trust evaluation algorithm. - Task 4: Implement and simulate agent interactions with conflicting goals. - Task 5: Analyze trust decisions and false positive/negative rates. -Task 6: Write thesis and prepare presentation.
Deliverables (Besides the final thesis document) - Game-theoretic trust evaluation algorithm - Simulation scenarios with conflicting objectives - Performance analysis report
Evaluation Criteria - Precision in distinguishing malicious vs. conflicting behavior. - Reduction in false trust decisions. - Scalability across team sizes and mission types.
